guile-gtk-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: guile-gnome changes


From: Andreas Rottmann
Subject: Re: guile-gnome changes
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:06:06 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> A brief note of changes in CVS:
>
> * You can define new enums and flags types by subclassing <genum> or 
>   <gflags>.
>
>   (define-class <foo-enum> (<genum>)
>     #:vtable #((one "One" 1) (two "Two" 2)))
>
Nice!

> * Documentation for guile-gnome is now done in texinfo. I haven't tried 
>   making info files yet, I just use a script to make the docs in
>   http://ambient.2y.net/tmp/guile-gnome/docs/tutorial/. Info sucks ;)
>
Well, I like it, since it nicely integrates into Emacs ;-)

> * You can pass either <gtype> or <gtype-class> instances to make a 
>   closure. Together with the enum fixes, this pretty much banishes the 
>   need for GType from the non-primitive API. Some work needs to happen 
>   on signals to finish this out.
>
> Interpreted languages don't need types and classes; the classes are the
> types. This realization could lead to a rethinking of our confused
> primitives/nonprimitives distinction. Dunno, though.
>
Yes, I always wondered what is so primitive about our primitives
;-). Do you know the rationale between the distinction? I never quite
got it.

Cheers, Rotty
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Make free software, not war!




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]