[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Re: unicode support, part 13: \-
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
[Groff] Re: unicode support, part 13: \- |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:05:28 +0100 (CET) |
> > > -//{ "\\-", "2212" },
> > > + { "\\-", "2212" },
> >
> > This change doesn't make sense. It's not possible to use a
> > backslash within \[...]. Consequently, glyph names which start
> > with a backslash can't be used as composites.
>
> The patch part 14 uses the glyph_name_to_unicode() function at a
> different place, namely for any glyphs, not only composed
> ones. Patch part 13 was meant as a preparation for part 14.
Ah, ok. I missed that. Patch applied.
Werner
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, (continued)
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/14
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/14
[Groff] unicode support, part 10: \[shc], Bruno Haible, 2006/02/21
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc], Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/23
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc] and the soft hyphen in HTML, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/23
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc] and the soft hyphen in HTML, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/24
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc] and the soft hyphen in HTML, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/23
[Groff] unicode support, part 12: \(la, \(ra, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/21
[Groff] unicode support, part 11: \[sqrt] vs \(sr, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/21