[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:48:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Werner Lemberg wrote:
> > - devhtml maps "la" to U+2329, "ra" to U+232A.
> > devutf8 and glyphuni.cpp map "la" to U+27E8, "ra" to U+27E9.
>
> I have a W3C document `entities.html' which describes HTML 4. In this
> file, U+2329 and U+232A are used for ⟨ and ⟩ -- has this
> changed meanwhile?
Still the same in http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/sgml/entities.html.
> Personally, I prefer U+27E8 and U+27E9 which are never double-width
> glyphs.
I agree; see the xterm screenshot in the other mail.
So we _do_ need the possibility to map the same glyph to different
Unicode code points depending on the output device. So for Unicode
font files, the CHARSET section will normally be absent, but can also
be present and contain just the exceptional mappings.
Bruno
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, James Cloos, 2006/02/13
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, James Cloos, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Pedro A . López-Valencia, 2006/02/16
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/14
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/14
[Groff] unicode support, part 10: \[shc], Bruno Haible, 2006/02/21
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc], Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/23
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc] and the soft hyphen in HTML, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/23
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc] and the soft hyphen in HTML, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/24
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc] and the soft hyphen in HTML, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/23