|
From: | raaj lokanathan |
Subject: | Re: Gpsd clear fix and merge fix |
Date: | Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:36:25 +0800 |
Yo raaj!
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:13:48 +0800
raaj lokanathan <address@hidden> wrote:
> But why I have to do the same checking in my application layer too?
Because that is the way it is.
> Isn't the gpsd supposed to already handle the NaN and store the track
> information.
Yes, but it has to store NAN what it has NO track information.
> Then when my libgps request it I can directly get the
> values from the gps data structure without having a second check in
> my application layer.
Yes, and those empty values will be NAN.
> Please correct me if I am wrong about this.
I keep trying. But his is the LAST try. It is what it is, deal with
it.
> If that's the case every
> application has to do the NaN checking?
Every application in C or C++.
> This is how my application is outputting the track information now
Without your code, your output is useless.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
address@hidden Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |