[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: source-based package management
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: source-based package management |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:56:17 +0200 (CEST) |
> Has anyone considered also offerin a source-based solution,
> like the popular Ports system in BSD distributions, or in
> Gentoo GNU/Linux's emerge program?
>
> Is there anything wrong with `./configure && make install'?
No automatic dependency management? Also, not all software is built
like this.
Sure, but not all software is packaged either. Anything that is
useful should be packaged. But I really fail to see the point of
`source based installers'. What purpose does it serve? Who will use
it?
If one just needs a automatic way to compile a couple hundred
packages, then GSC does that job, and is easily tweakable.
But for all other purposes, I really cannot see what is so bad with
`./configure && make install'. If you are a developer, you will want
alot of control over what happens, and a `source based installer' will
not help you there.
Cheers.
- source-based package management, a thing, 2006/06/19
- Re: source-based package management, Luis Araujo, 2006/06/20
- Re: source-based package management, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/06/20
- Re: source-based package management, Luis Araujo, 2006/06/20
- Re: source-based package management, Claudio Fontana, 2006/06/20