[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:44:52 +0900 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> I'm not sure what you mean by "for Mach", but if you mean "one
> doesn't call it Mach" then you're mistaken. I have often heard
> people refer to it that way, and I can't recall ever hearing them
> refer to it as BSD.
>
> Would be the first time I have heard it, and I have been mucking about
> with Mach for quite sometime now.
Perhaps current-day Mach users use different terminology, but in the
"old days" (late '80s, early '90s, which was when I had the most
exposure to the Mach community) people referred to their computer as
running "Mach"; the term "BSD" never came up unless they were explaining
the details of the implementation.
-Miles
--
(\(\
(^.^)
(")")
*This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread.
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, (continued)
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Richard Tobin, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Miles Bader, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
Message not available