[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU/Linux Naming
From: |
Richard Tobin |
Subject: |
Re: GNU/Linux Naming |
Date: |
9 Dec 2007 12:23:02 GMT |
In article <mailman.4786.1197198311.18990.gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org>,
Alfred M. Szmidt <ams@gnu.org> wrote:
>One does not call BSD using Mach for
>Mach, one calls it BSD.
I'm not sure what you mean by "for Mach", but if you mean "one doesn't
call it Mach" then you're mistaken. I have often heard people refer
to it that way, and I can't recall ever hearing them refer to it as
BSD.
-- Richard
--
:wq
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Keith Thompson, 2007/12/06
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Keith Thompson, 2007/12/08
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/12/08
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Keith Thompson, 2007/12/08
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/12/08
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Keith Thompson, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming,
Richard Tobin <=
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, David Kastrup, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Miles Bader, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Noah Slater, 2007/12/09
- Message not available
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Miles Bader, 2007/12/09
- Re: GNU/Linux Naming, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/12/09
Message not available