[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More GPL questions
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: More GPL questions |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:25:26 +0200 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>
> Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Linking == modification.
>
> These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If
> identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Linking == deriviate work.
Your GPL-FAQing GNUish crackpot "deriviate" theory is just an evidence
that can be really helpful in the context of insanity defense for
GNUtians outside the GNU Republic.
>
> Program, and can be reasonably considered independent and separate
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Linking == depends on another work to function.
It's interoperability (what GNU Reichsminister für Volksaufklärung und
Propaganda calls "interpenetration"), retard.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: More GPL questions, (continued)
Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/16
- Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/16
- Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/16
Message not availableRe: More GPL questions,
Alexander Terekhov <=
Message not availableRe: More GPL questions, David Hansen, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, John Hasler, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/16
Message not available