[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More GPL questions
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: More GPL questions |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:59:18 +0200 (CEST) |
> I have a proprietary sdk that is being distributed. As part of
> this sdk, I have an /examples/ folder where I include source code
> showing how to use various elements of the sdk in various display
> enviornments. We have on example based on X11, another for
> OpenGL. I want to include a Qt example with my code, as well,
> since there has been some interest in it. The actual sdk being
> released contains no GPL components, and this would merely be an
> example of how to use the SDK and Qt. This example program would
> dynamically link to both Qt and my sdk's library. Does including
> this example source code in my distrubuted tarball put the entire
> thing, including the sdk, under the GPL?
Of course not - you're not including Qt, are you? If it's source
code you wrote yourself, that happens to call Qt routines, then it
is not subject to the Qt license.
By linking to a GPLed library, which Qt is, you must abide by that
license.
Also, the OP is _including_ GPLed source code into his library, not
just linking it.
- Re: More GPL questions, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Message not available
- Re: More GPL questions, David Hansen, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, David Kastrup, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/17
- Re: More GPL questions, John Hasler, 2006/10/17
Re: More GPL questions, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2006/10/16
- Re: More GPL questions,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Message not available
Message not available
Message not available