Re: More GPL questions

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> 
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> >>
> >> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> >>
> >> > Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> >> Once you start transforming it through compilers and linkers the
> >> >> picture might change, depending on how much of the library is included
> >> >> in the transformed source code. If, for example, you execute 'cc -E',
> >> >> the resulting source code will contain the whole of "stdio.h", and as
> >> >> such it's now most definitely something that is affected by the stdio.h
> >> >> copyright (I leave it to Alexander to define if it's a derivative work,
> >> >> a compilation, or anything he wishes).
> >> >
> >> > Mechanical transformation never create derivative works.
> >>
> >> Sure, but we are not talking about "mechanical transformation", but
> >> mechanical _combination_.  "cc -E" _includes_ stdio.h and other stuff.
> >
> > Whatever, retard.
> 
> Actually, it also replaces macros.  

And? In other news RMS called to boycott Caterpillar, Exxon-Mobil, Coca Cola 
Company, Chinese products, and Harry Potter Books.

> Looks like you have run out of arguments again.

Uh moron dak.

regards,
alexander.