[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2? |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:38:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
> David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>>
>> > David Kastrup wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > "Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>> >> > [...]
>> >> >> >From offical dutites, yes, because Thomas went against the policies of
>> >> >> the GNU project (outright refusing to use the GFDL in a GNU project
>> >> >
>> >> > Interesting. So much about GNU freedom of speech.
>> >>
>> >> As the maintainer of a GNU project, one is responsible for
>> >> implementing the GNU policies. That's not a matter of freedom of
>> > ^
>> > |
>> > Grand-Imperator's ----+ (aka GNU President)
>>
>> Of course the president of the FSF sets the policies of the GNU
>> project he initiated and is in charge of. That's nothing to be
>> surprised about.
>
> Really? While US President has the power to veto decisions (except
> constitutional amendments) made by Congress, the Congress has the
> power to negate presidential vetos (2/3 majority vote).
You'll find that the charter of the FSF (and pretty much every
organization) differs from the constitution of the US.
>> > And what exactly did Bushnell failed to implement apart from voicing
>> > dissent regarding (un)freeness of the GFDL?
>>
>> Your reading comprehension seems to be impaired. It was not a problem
>> of "voicing dissent" with the documentation policies, but rather of
>> failing to implement them in a project where he was in the officially
>> appointed position for doing so.
>
> And what did he failed to implement? Care to provide an example of
> his refusal to adhere in *implementing* something?
Your reading comprehension _really_ is impaired. He refused to change
the license of Hurd documentation to the GFDL as prescribed by FSF
policies. Since the whole point of a GNU project maintainer is to
oversee the implementation of the GNU project policies, this made it
necessary to look for another maintainer.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, (continued)
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/07
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/07
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/07
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Miles Bader, 2006/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, kero552, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, John Hasler, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/07