[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2? |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Oct 2006 21:32:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> > Yes. Linux isn't the main kernel that GLIBC supports to begin
> > with.
>
> Really? Did you check it with Drepper of Red Hat, GNUtian ueber
> moron ams?
>
> There is a reason why it is called the GNU C library.
<URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/FAQ.html#s-1.1>
The systems glibc is known to work on as of this release, and most
probably in the future, are:
*-*-gnu GNU Hurd
i[3456]86-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.x on Intel
m68k-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.x on Motorola 680x0
alpha*-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.x on DEC Alpha
powerpc-*-linux-gnu Linux and MkLinux on PowerPC systems
powerpc64-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.4+ on 64-bit PowerPC systems
sparc-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.x on SPARC
sparc64-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.x on UltraSPARC
arm-*-none ARM standalone systems
arm-*-linux Linux-2.x on ARM
arm-*-linuxaout Linux-2.x on ARM using a.out binaries
mips*-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.x on MIPS
ia64-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.x on ia64
s390-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.x on IBM S/390
s390x-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.x on IBM S/390 64-bit
cris-*-linux-gnu Linux-2.4+ on CRIS
-snip-
The old GNU libc supported other platforms, but at some point of time
the availability of a production quality free kernel made it sensible
to focus on those platforms which relied on glibc for a complete free
system. In a similar vein, portability to compilers other than GCC
has been flushed: no point in complicating the code for the sake of
non-free alternatives when a good free one is available.
The Hurd is not even of much interest to RMS himself anymore. No harm
if it becomes feasible at one point of time, but nothing that is yet
of major strategic interest to the GNU project. Linux fits the bill
as a kernel well enough. Whether the GPLv3 controversy might be able
to rekindle some of the interest remains to be seen.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/07
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/07
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/07
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/07
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/10/07
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, David Kastrup, 2006/10/09
- Re: Can linux kernel claim it uses GPL v2?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/10/09