Re: Linux is SHIT

[jim]

David Kastrup wrote:
> jesse@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F. Hughes) writes:
>
>
> > "Barak Zalstein" <no_spam@please.not> writes:
> >
> >
> > > "David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message
> > > x5d64uck6s.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:x5d64uck6s.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
> > >
> > > > So why should we listen to the rants of a self-declared criminal?
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, Windows XP won't run for long without being allowed to phone
> > > > home to Redmont and report by whom it is being used.  So you better
> > > > be a _careful_ criminal.
> > > >
> > > > Or a stupid liar.
> > >
> > > I fail to understand why you continuosly consider sharing that
> > > kind of critical information as a criminal activity (just do that
> > > outside of corporate environment).  What if this attitude was
> > > taught (and enforced) in school?  Being pedantic regarding
> > > licenses and eulas may result in confining oneself to a 80x25
> > > ghetto buffer.
> >
> > So there's an inherent right to use Windows without paying for it,
> > since the alternative is unattractive?
> >
> > Must be the pursuit of happiness includes pretty GUIs.  Of course,
> > there *are* free pretty GUIs, but maybe the pursuit of happiness
> > includes Microsoft GUIs.
>
>
> Please notice that the American constitution asserts the right to the
> _pursuit_ of happiness, not the right to happiness itself.
>
> The pursuit is already possible by earning enough money to _purchase_
> a licence to software with a pretty GUI.
Actually, it's the declaration of independence, and it guarentees
the right to the purfuit of happinefs.

Jim