[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linux is SHIT
From: |
John Hasler |
Subject: |
Re: Linux is SHIT |
Date: |
Mon, 24 May 2004 11:24:46 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
Barak writes:
> There's a difference between approaching an already set-up standard
> machine, launching a tutorial and following the instructions, and between
> partitioning, setting up dial-up settings, compiling the kernel, and
> googling for serial numbers of your hardware.
Modern Linux distributions are at least as easy to install as Microsoft
Windows (and Googling for serial numbers would be singularly useless).
> Don't most commercial Linux distros restrict copying using one way or
> another, if not with non-GPL components, than with trademarks and logos?
In the USA trademarks do not restrict copying.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
- Re: Linux is SHIT, (continued)
- Re: Linux is SHIT, Roedy Green, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, David Kastrup, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, Barak Zalstein, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, David Kastrup, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, Barak Zalstein, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, David Kastrup, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, Barak Zalstein, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, David Kastrup, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT,
John Hasler <=
- Re: Linux is SHIT, Barak Zalstein, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, David Kastrup, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, Barak Zalstein, 2004/05/25
- Re: Linux is SHIT, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, David Kastrup, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, Paul Jarc, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, John Hasler, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, Barak Zalstein, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, David Kastrup, 2004/05/24
- Re: Linux is SHIT, jim, 2004/05/24