[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending]
From: |
AES/newspost |
Subject: |
Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending] |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2004 08:22:32 -0700 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.1 (PPC) |
In article <20040512231913.15404bf7.tengo@DELETEMEecc.lu>,
Stefaan A Eeckels <tengo@DELETEMEecc.lu> wrote:
>
> If this is correct, a software author should have every
> program examined by a patent attorney, have a stash of
> cash in order to be able to defend a lawsuit, and prepare
> to spend time in court if ever one of her programs is seen
> as a threat by one of the big boys, in which case it is
> better to sell them the program before she's bankrupted.
>
And fight for massive patent reform which puts far more burden of
justification on the patent applicant, includes far more substantial
potential downsides for applying for and being granted an invalid
patent, involves genuine technical as well as legal expertise in
evaluating patent applications, and gives far more realistic weight to
prior art and genuine novelty.
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], (continued)
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/12
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/12
- RE: The patent process, PrussianSnow, 2004/05/12
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending],
AES/newspost <=
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Henry E Schaffer, 2004/05/16
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], pltrgyst, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Pearson, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Pearson, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], AES/newspost, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11