[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The patent process
From: |
Barry Margolin |
Subject: |
Re: The patent process |
Date: |
Thu, 13 May 2004 11:04:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X) |
In article <b8760489.0405122223.56fd141a@posting.google.com>,
khkwan@yahoo.com (Chris Kwan) wrote:
> I disagree here. Patent is virtually a western invention with less
> than 300 yrs of history if I am correct. The easterners created many
> inventions and shared many ideas openly by making available the text,
> including pasta and making of paper and silk. Of course one would
> argue that only limited people may have accessed to these text so in a
> way is a barrier. But the fact still remains many inventions
> particularly in medicine were tested and challeged by a series of
> trial and error in the past. Many modern medicine particularly those
> that look for active elements were sourced from ancient manuscripts
> for example, resistance to malaria ?
Patents are indeed a relatively recent invention, but that may be
because they're only a recent need. Hundreds of years ago, many of the
inventions like the ones you mentioned were necessities of life. It
doesn't take much encouragement to develop technologies that make life
possible, but improvements and conveniences are a different matter.
Also, because travel was harder and the population smaller, communities
were much smaller. Craftsmen mostly worked for themselves and sold to
their local communities, so competition was not a problem. If someone
hundreds of miles away copied your invention it didn't matter to you,
because his customers were not potential customers of yours.
It has also been argued that one of the reasons why the US became the
source of so much technology development in the 19th and 20th centuries
is because of our patent system. Yes, there has always been invention,
but the rate over the past couple of centuries in the west has been a
quantum leap beyond previous times. Some of this can be attributed to a
general "industrious spirit" of Americans, as well as developments
necessary to open up our frontiers (guns, railroads). Unfortunately,
it's difficult to tell the precise cause-effect relationships -- it's
not possible to perform a controlled experiment to see what would happen
in a country just like the US but without our patent system.
--
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], (continued)
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Pearson, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process, Christopher Browne, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process, Barry Pearson, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process, Barry Margolin, 2004/05/12
- Re: The patent process, Rahul Dhesi, 2004/05/12
- Re: The patent process, Chris Kwan, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process,
Barry Margolin <=
- Re: The patent process, Rahul Dhesi, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process, 23 Skiddoo !, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process, Chuck Szmanda, 2004/05/14
- Re: The patent process, Alun, 2004/05/15
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Pearson, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11