[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending]
From: |
Henry E Schaffer |
Subject: |
Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending] |
Date: |
Mon, 17 May 2004 00:19:45 +0000 (UTC) |
In article <Xns94E6741B54989elektrosmdonet@130.133.1.4>,
Alun <elektros@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ..
>I don't think the conclusions follow from the premises in that. I think
>most of us who are patent professionals agree that the reason that bad
>software patents issue is that the examiners mostly look at existing
>patents for prior art. Since software wasn't always patentable, it is a
>given that most really basic ideas won't be found in their search, and so
>they are then compelled to allow the patent.
> ...
Problems of this sort have been known since the start of issuance of
software patents. A Univ. of Michigan faculty member (now emeritus)
Bernie Galler has had a long history of working on these problems.
Search on his name to find more information - also see www.spi.org
--
--henry schaffer
hes _AT_ ncsu _DOT_ edu
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], (continued)
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/12
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/12
- RE: The patent process, PrussianSnow, 2004/05/12
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], AES/newspost, 2004/05/13
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending],
Henry E Schaffer <=
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Alun, 2004/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], pltrgyst, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Pearson, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Margolin, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Barry Pearson, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], AES/newspost, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/11
- Re: The patent process [Was Re: Sharing the Family PC is Patent-Pending], David Kastrup, 2004/05/11