[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters
From: |
Bernd Jendrissek |
Subject: |
Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters |
Date: |
Thu, 6 May 2004 16:20:31 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.7.1-20030918 ("Berneray") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.18 (i686)) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <20040506165838.75596fe6.tengo@DELETEMEecc.lu> Stefaan A
Eeckels <tengo@deletemeecc.lu> wrote:
>Either the investment can be recouped by the sale of the
>original item, or it needs to be spread over the sale of
>a number of copies.
You can't really "spread" the investment over the sale of a number of
copies - the investment is a sunk cost that you can't "trade in" for
something else. Once it's made, it's made.
You have to fund it out of your *economic profits*.
>In the latter case, if not enough revenue can be derived from the sale
>of copies (because someone else makes and sells them), then it might
>not be economically possible to produce the original.
You might find (or just predict, rather) that the equilibrium price
would be below what you need to be able to make a profit out of which,
*once pooled*, your mortgage on the investment must be paid.
>> Never mind that it gets copied: it has to be _done_ before it can be
>> copied.
>
>Yup, and those who do it need to earn a living.
Such a timeless quote I had to leave it in.
- --
http://voyager.abite.co.za/~berndj/ (f1084a555d2098411cff4cefd41d2e2a1c85d18c)
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFAmmSN/FmLrNfLpjMRAliFAJ9gJJ4t1SilmWXEE468cRtJBoX+hwCdFwef
Y17++NFR82zK4h6h025Tnaw=
=owXf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, (continued)
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/08
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/08
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/08
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/08
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/08
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/08
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/08
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/10
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/05/10
- Message not available
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/05/11
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters,
Bernd Jendrissek <=
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Bernd Jendrissek, 2004/05/07
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, David Kastrup, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, John Hasler, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Martin Dickopp, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Stefaan A Eeckels, 2004/05/06