|
| From: | Martin Dickopp |
| Subject: | Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters |
| Date: | Sat, 08 May 2004 20:30:13 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes: > FSF's theory of derivative works is total crap. The FSF licenses simply refer to the definition in coypright law. Do you think that referring to copyright law is crap, or do you think that the definition in copyright law itself is crap? If the latter, which jurisdiction(s) do you have in mind? Martin
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |