[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters
From: |
Bernd Jendrissek |
Subject: |
Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters |
Date: |
Tue, 4 May 2004 06:51:46 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.7.1-20030918 ("Berneray") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.18 (i686)) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <5f063e31.0405031959.2d571f7@posting.google.com>
Snuffelluffogus <darkred@myway.com> wrote:
>but I know a scam when I see one.
As do I.
>But hey, if the FSF were to deny themselves corporate money
>as a matter of principle, I'd be content with them. Unfortunately
>they cannot, will not, and would never want to give their
>corporate masters the cold shoulder.
Oh, so taking their money helps corporations, while not taking their
money harms them?
>You can pretend as some people do about politicians that corporate
>money doesn't affect their actions or judgements, but it is
>sheer wishful thinking, naivete of the worst sort.
Odd that most of the FSF's funding comes from individuals (IIRC), eh?
>This isn't to say there isn't a place for monetarily free,
>open source software in the world.
Oh, I see, you're just sore that the GPL wouldn't allow you to pirate
the work of principled people into a non-free product, which is exactly
what those principled people want to prevent, out of principle?
>But corporate lackeys shouldn't be the vanguards of any such thing.
What "such thing" - the software? Newsflash: the FSF, and not its few
corporate sponsors, owns the copyright to GCC, glibc, and hundreds of
other GNU projects.
>Corporations are authoritarian and exploitative and have a long history
>of serious abuses.
So why don't you campaign against corporate personhood, instead of
railing against an organisation (the FSF) which does good work to
counteract those abuses (by building a free (speech) equivalent of
proprietary software)?
- --
http://voyager.abite.co.za/~berndj/ (f1084a555d2098411cff4cefd41d2e2a1c85d18c)
"IBM has more patent litigation lawyers than SCO has employees." - unknown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFAlzw//FmLrNfLpjMRAt9FAJ4mhhQobnhvvj3c/+oleOy5WaK3eQCeLLQf
zYw1YogLNceNE+AL/vAqDE0=
=W2uf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, (continued)
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Russ Allbery, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/05/07
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Bernd Jendrissek, 2004/05/07
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/05/07
Message not available
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/05/04
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters,
Bernd Jendrissek <=
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Per Abrahamsen, 2004/05/04
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/05/04
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Russ Allbery, 2004/05/05
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/05/05
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Russ Allbery, 2004/05/05
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/05/06
- Message not available
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Snuffelluffogus, 2004/05/06
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, Rui Miguel Seabra, 2004/05/07
- Re: FSF : lackeys of their corporate masters, David Kastrup, 2004/05/07