[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL? |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:19:17 -0600 (MDT) |
Debian includes vcg as package. We should just ask mr
Sander to provide the source code for the package
really nicely. Otherwise I will try and deuglify the
source sometime...
Based on which version of VCG? Based on the info posted
in this discussion, version 1.0 was properly released
under the GPL but version 1.3 was not.
But we can still make modifications to most of the
code and make it better, just the layout code is
missing. The layout code is still the kernel of the
program, but cosmetic changes can still be made.
I am completely lost now. Why is the layout code missing?
Which version of VCG are you talking about now?
- Is this circumvention of the GPL?, , 2002/04/03
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/03
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/04
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/04
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/05
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/05
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/06
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/06
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/07
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/08
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/10
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/10
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2002/04/06
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, John Anderjaska, 2002/04/06
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/07
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/07
Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/03