[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL? |
Date: |
06 Apr 2002 23:09:09 +0100 |
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 20:05, Richard Stallman wrote:
> I mean that the compiler has routines for formatting
> RTLS into various graphs formats.
> All of the graph-formats are read by graph layout
> tools. The graph layout tools are generally not free.
>
> I guess we need to develop a free graph-layout tool.
> Is there really NO free graph-layout tool?
In a quick search I found this one:
http://atgc.org/PhyloGrapher/PhyloGrapher_Welcome.html
I do not know how good it is, the screen shots are not the most
beautiful graphs I've seend drawn, but it may be of some help.
In freshmeat I found too many entries matching graph (mostly because of
graphics...) but this one seems usable.
A friend of mine is making a doctorship that envolves swarm intelligence
and he needed graph drawing tools, so I may be able to provide some more
links by monday or something, since he prefered to use Free tools.
hugs, rui
--
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi
+ So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, (continued)
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/04
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/05
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/05
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/06
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/06
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/07
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/08
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/08
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/10
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/10
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, John Anderjaska, 2002/04/06
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/07
- Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/07
Re: Is this circumvention of the GPL?, James Michael DuPont, 2002/04/03