[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation
From: |
Ali Abdul Ghani |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2016 02:45:00 -0700 |
> suggests: the source for Uruk is already 100% free Trisquel, so the
Please Say "uruk gnu/linux" not " uruk"
When you say "uruk"
you Refer to uruk project
uruk is project
and uruk gnu/linux is part from this project
se
https://urukproject.org
2016-06-28 2:05 جرينتش-07:00, Ali Abdul Ghani <address@hidden>:
>> I think you should at least make a sha256 checksum of all the scripts
>> you are running and the assets you are installing.
> now we use git
> in git
> if the Connection is stop
> git will Tell the user
> and Nothing will be install
>
>
>
> 2016-06-28 1:42 جرينتش-07:00, hellekin <address@hidden>:
>> On 06/27/2016 01:43 PM, Jaromil wrote:
>>>
>>> I believe that Uruk can be 100% free even without offering a whole
>>> package repository, but just by publishing all sources
>>>
>>
>> I tend to agree with Jaromil (not only because we're brothers) that
>> having your own repositories is the cherry on top of the cake.
>>
>> I understand that the "own repos" rule is to prevent anyone from making
>> a distro out of another without core changes (why not participate in the
>> original distribution directly?).
>>
>> Nevertheless I see Ali's case a bit differently than what the rule
>> suggests: the source for Uruk is already 100% free Trisquel, so the
>> argument that the developers should be able to patch things themselves
>> seems a be redundant if not plain irrelevant; Ali's work for software
>> freedom, accessibility, and growing community support around these has
>> been exemplary. Not only he volunteered across free distros to
>> facilitate the adoption of accessible software, he also brings together
>> people locally in war-torn Iraq.
>>
>> For these reasons, the "no own repos" rule should be circumvented
>> somehow. That could mean to work with Trisquel to integrate changes
>> made in Uruk, or financial support to bring the Uruk team to capacity.
>>
>> In any case, judging on absolute values is not gonna work.
>>
>> ==
>> hk
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Emacs is the ground. We run around and act silly on top of it, and
> when we die, may our remnants grace its ongoing incrementation.
>
--
Emacs is the ground. We run around and act silly on top of it, and
when we die, may our remnants grace its ongoing incrementation.
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, (continued)
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/27
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], Ineiev, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] criteria for listing as fully free [was: Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation], hellekin, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ineiev, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, hellekin, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Ali Abdul Ghani, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation,
Ali Abdul Ghani <=
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, André Silva, 2016/06/28
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation, Jaromil, 2016/06/28