Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation

[Ali Abdul Ghani]

>
> I do
> read code and after reading Uruk's script to update I'd rather not
> endorse it based on the quality of the code, which I hope will be
> improved. I guess Uruk would be better off without any update, or
> adopting amprolla to distribute its packages as overlay to Trisquel's
> repository.
THNX,
Can you tell me What are the problems in the script??

2016-06-28 0:47 جرينتش-07:00, Ineiev <address@hidden>:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:06:06AM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
>>
>> I do
>> read code and after reading Uruk's script to update I'd rather not
>> endorse it based on the quality of the code, which I hope will be
>> improved. I guess Uruk would be better off without any update, or
>> adopting amprolla to distribute its packages as overlay to Trisquel's
>> repository.
>
> Thank you!
>


-- 
Emacs is the ground. We run around and act silly on top of it, and
when we die, may our remnants grace its ongoing incrementation.