Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation

[Ineiev]

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:06:06AM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
> 
> I do
> read code and after reading Uruk's script to update I'd rather not
> endorse it based on the quality of the code, which I hope will be
> improved. I guess Uruk would be better off without any update, or
> adopting amprolla to distribute its packages as overlay to Trisquel's
> repository.

Thank you!

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature