[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit
From: |
Catalin Marinas |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:11:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> But those aren't really empty, if they update merge information (in
> arch this would be obviously true -- there would be new patch logs in
> the changeset beside the commit patch-log).
True, but in my Linux tree I don't add the changeset file. A commit
would only create a new log.
Anyway, I think it is useful that arch reports an error if there
aren't any modified files and a having an option to override this.
Catalin
- [Gnu-arch-users] empty commit, Deliverable Mail, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, David Allouche, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Mark A. Flacy, 2005/03/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Ulf Ochsenfahrt, 2005/03/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2005/03/24
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] empty commit, David Allouche, 2005/03/22