[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:42:49 +0900 |
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:08:49 +0000, Catalin Marinas
<address@hidden> wrote:
> > In practice, I'm not sure anyone other than Tom use this "feature",
> > but that's life.
>
> The BKCVS Linux repository seems to have many empty commits, usually
> the merges from other unchanged trees. Only the log is updated (with
> something like "merge from ...").
But those aren't really empty, if they update merge information (in
arch this would be obviously true -- there would be new patch logs in
the changeset beside the commit patch-log).
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- [Gnu-arch-users] empty commit, Deliverable Mail, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, David Allouche, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Mark A. Flacy, 2005/03/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Ulf Ochsenfahrt, 2005/03/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2005/03/24
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] empty commit, David Allouche, 2005/03/22