[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit
From: |
David Allouche |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:36:15 +0100 |
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 16:56 +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Deliverable Mail <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > "the idiot has just run me twice, well that's life, just go on and
> > do it, there's no reason in dissuading him anyhow"...:)
>
> What tla says about your second commit is more: "The intelligent guy!
> he noticed that he could add a log entry without making any change by
> running tla commit twice. Let's obey!".
n
> In practice, I'm not sure anyone other than Tom use this "feature",
> but that's life.
I do use it from time to time. The use cases are "replay --reverse some
patches including the latest patch" or "add a revision providing an
erratum comment for the previous revision".
> There have been some discussions about adding a --no-empty-commit or
> whatever to tla, that could be enabled by default by wrappers, but I
> think no one bothered to implement it up to now.
Creating an empty commit by mistake is definitely the common case.
--
-- ddaa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] empty commit, Deliverable Mail, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit,
David Allouche <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Mark A. Flacy, 2005/03/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Ulf Ochsenfahrt, 2005/03/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Tom Lord, 2005/03/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: empty commit, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2005/03/24
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] empty commit, David Allouche, 2005/03/22