[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:15:11 +0900 |
Jani Monoses <address@hidden> writes:
> Aside from incompatibility what would be the disadvantages of
> representing an import as a changeset against an empty tree?
A really nice property of the arch archive format is that it's almost
exactly "what a human would use" if he were doing it manually. Part of
this is storing imports as a simple tarball of the source tree.
-Miles
--
Freedom's just another word, for nothing left to lose --Janis Joplin
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Anand Kumria, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Cameron Patrick, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Cameron Patrick, 2004/10/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, John S. Yates, Jr., 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, John Meinel, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/15