[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit
From: |
John S. Yates, Jr. |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:57:01 -0400 |
Cameron Patrick wrote:
> >
> > Creating a new directory and sticking some contents in it mean that
> > there's no possibility of reusing the name in the future.
>
> Only if someone else catches you :-) Otherwise rm -rf'ing it and
> removing any left-overs from the revision library works pretty well
> (even if changing history isn't officially encouraged).
There is a difference between changing history and undoing a mistake.
Arch archives are not autonomously collected chronologies. They grow
at user initiated points. Thus an undo is somewhat meaningful. That
being said it would seem to entail significant issues with caching,
mirroring, etc.
/john
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Anand Kumria, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Aaron Bentley, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Cameron Patrick, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/10/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Cameron Patrick, 2004/10/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit,
John S. Yates, Jr. <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Thomas Lord, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, John Meinel, 2004/10/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla import versus tla commit, Stefan Monnier, 2004/10/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla import versus tla commit, Robert Collins, 2004/10/14