[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again
From: |
mlh |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:54:49 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 07:23:26PM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 19:14, address@hidden wrote:
> The only thing I think you're really buying with your proposal is
> flattening out the file structure to not have subdirectories (and thus
> their default permissions) at issue -- but that still doesn't completely
> fix the umask problem (ie. if the default umask doesn't provide even
> read access to other users), and is a pretty strong loss on some other
> accounts.
Yes, but in the environment we're talking about,
the typical defualt umask allows reading by other.
With a sequence of tar files you only have to fix the
parent dirs perms once to allow writes. They won't be
affected by the addition of further tars.
Matt
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Matthew Palmer, 2004/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Jan Hudec, 2004/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Matthew Palmer, 2004/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Jan Hudec, 2004/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, James Blackwell, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Jan Hudec, 2004/08/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Cameron Patrick, 2004/08/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, James Blackwell, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, mlh, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, mlh, 2004/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] multiple committers, again, Robert Anderson, 2004/08/24