[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla inventory --trees --nested doesn't find d
From: |
Jan Hudec |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla inventory --trees --nested doesn't find deeply nested trees |
Date: |
Wed, 19 May 2004 02:00:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 13:43:45 +0100, Richard Curnow wrote:
> I have a working directory structure built from a config that looks like
> this
>
> a address@hidden/y--z1--0
> b address@hidden/y--z2--0
> c address@hidden/y--z3--0
> d/e address@hidden/y--z4--0
> f/g address@hidden/y--z5--0
>
> If I'm in the directory containing a, b, c, d, f as subdirectories and
> run
>
> tla inventory --trees --nested
>
> I only get a, b and c reported. d/e and f/g are not shown. Note that
> neither d nor f have {arch} subdirectories themselves. (This is
> intentional as there is nothing to revision control at that level of the
> tree. In fact I also have a fuller config that has d/e1, d/e2, ...,
> d/eN as N subdirectories under d, each subdirectory corresponding to a
> different variant of something.)
Are 'd' and 'f' SOURCE directories? They wouldn't be descended otherwise.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec
<address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature