[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes) |
Date: |
Wed, 5 May 2004 16:19:34 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Colin Walters <address@hidden>
> > 2) .o, .a, .so, .core, and .so* do not belong in junk.
> > Those files can be very, very valuable _and_ difficult or
> > impossible to reproduce. "junk", meanwhile, is comprised of files
> > that may be casually deleted.
> Well, I can see the argument for core not being junk. The others should
> be easily reproducible in almost all cases. Anyways, what do you
> suggest? backup?
I don't see anything wrong with "backup".
> > 3) .rej does not belong in unrecognized. =20
> Perhaps the best way would be a fifth class,
I'll run screaming from the room while yanking out my hair, now. :-)
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes), (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes), Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes), Andrew Suffield, 2004/05/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes), Tom Lord, 2004/05/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes), Miles Bader, 2004/05/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes), Miles Bader, 2004/05/05
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes), Colin Walters, 2004/05/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes),
Tom Lord <=