[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: log-buf-len dynamic (fwd)
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: log-buf-len dynamic (fwd) |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:35:54 +0200 (CEST) |
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:56:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pau Aliagas <address@hidden>
To: lkml <address@hidden>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: log-buf-len dynamic
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Use CVS and be happy. But don't complain to others that have needs that
> CVS simply can't fill.
> ....
> Indeed. That's pretty much all non-distributed stuff is useful for, from
> where I'm stading. Small projects with a few developers and a lot of
> read-only stuff. And even there the developers will bitch about the
> limitations.
>
> Sure, SVN makes branches cheaper, but you still have to work with them
> like under CVS, ie merging is a total disaster. And you still can't make
> it your private repository.
No flame wars intended, but arch does this and more. See:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch
Distributed, complex merging, easy branches... and even a linux repository
from 0.1, not yet in the detail of the current cvs or bk, but easyly
achievable if anyone is interested in spending the time to import it.
Pau
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: log-buf-len dynamic (fwd),
Pau Aliagas <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Adam Spiers, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Miles Bader, 2003/09/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Inertia on lkml?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Momchil Velikov, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Zack Brown, 2003/09/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Inertia on lkml?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/25