[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:21:39 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, linux) |
>>>>> "Samium" == Samium Gromoff <address@hidden> writes:
Samium> In this way we would not need to have _anything_ to do
Samium> with bk itself.
Right, and if you eat your hamburger at McDonald's you have nothing to
do with killing cows. Like, if you're migrating a bk repository, bk
is at the other end of the food chain, you cannot get around it.
Jeez, just buy the freakin' license. Apply to the FSF for a grant to
cover the expense. (I doubt you'll get it, but it's a legitimate and
important use for FSF development funds.)
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
To this end "... we mutually pledge to each other
our Lives, our FORTUNES, and our sacred Honor."
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Paul Hedderly, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Stig Brautaset, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/17