[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?
From: |
Karel Gardas |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:01:45 +0200 (CEST) |
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Stig Brautaset wrote:
> On Sep 17 2003, Samium wrote:
> > > So it looks like you're right. Someone wrote bk2svn too, I wonder what
> > > their relation to svn itself was..
> >
> > Hmm, so what about using bk2svn as the start, instead of bk?
>
> A few questions:
>
> Would that require svn to be setup?
> Why not use base it on cscvs instead?
Other question: is bk2cvs normal product sell by BitMover or just and only
"service" provided to Linux kernel developers/users community? In the
later case possible bk2arch might be used only for updating Linux Arch
archive.
Cheers,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas address@hidden
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Stig Brautaset, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?,
Karel Gardas <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/17