[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ? |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:22:23 +0200 (CEST) |
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Alexander Deruwe wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 03:29:14PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Maybe running cscvs on the bk2cvs repository would yield some nice
> results; I don't know.
I think this is the easiest path if we want the same granularity than bk;
if we have enough with the published releases, then the current "arched"
linux kernel would do.
Nevertheless, if the Linux developers are to adopt a new RCS, we should
try the former path. If cscvs works s well as it looks from the posts I've
read, it's only a matter of just doing it.
Pau
- [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Paul Hedderly, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Paul Hedderly, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Paul Hedderly, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?,
Pau Aliagas <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] BK sync ?, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Stig Brautaset, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Samium Gromoff, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Alexander Deruwe, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Tom Lord, 2003/09/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Karel Gardas, 2003/09/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BK sync ?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/09/17