[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14 |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:54:26 +0200 (CEST) |
> Another point is that the arrays returned are 0-terminated. this
> assumes that 0 is not a valid selector variant, but I don't see code
> to check for this in the cmap 14_validate function. will add these
George, what do you think of undefining TT_CONFIG_CMAP_FORMAT_14 until
the specs are official?
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, George Williams, 2007/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/10/10
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, George Williams, 2007/10/10
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/10/11
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, David Turner, 2007/10/19
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/10/19
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, David Turner, 2007/10/19
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, David Turner, 2007/10/19
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, George Williams, 2007/10/19
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/10/20
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, George Williams, 2007/10/11
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 14, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/10/15
- Re: [ft-devel] About the Cmap format 12, suzuki toshiya, 2007/10/08