|
From: | Vincent Caron |
Subject: | Re: [Devel] Help me understand this... I'm loosing my sanity. Please. |
Date: | Wed, 09 Apr 2003 19:23:20 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9 |
Maurizio Colucci wrote:
Gosh. The opposite of what I guessed.So how is it possible that redhat's rendering is better?I have uploaded some pictures showing the difference: http://www.geocities.com/seguso2001/nimbus-roman-13-debian.png http://www.geocities.com/seguso2001/nimbus-roman-13-redhat8.png Since we are using same distribution (debian unstable), could you be so kind as to check if you have the same results?
I could reproduce the problem with the Nimbus roman font while running a Gnome application (using a freshly compiled FreeType 2.1.4). Using Gnome font configuration tool, I found out that the rendering became correct when I turned hinting off (the other hinting modes quoted as 'slight', 'medium' and 'full' would all fail on the 'p'). I don't have the other fonts installed.
This is a Type1 font, so the TrueType byte code interpreter does not come in the way. It can be an hinting error in the font itself (is RedHat using an updated font file ? Here it is n021003l.pfb). It maybe an Xft configuration issue, RedHat can disable hinting for specific fonts at given sizes when it proves to improve rendering quality. Etc ...
On both redhat and debian I tried:$ ldd oowriter but the answer was: "not a dynamic executable"
These are frontend scripts which launch the real executable, you'll have to find this executable and run ldd on it.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |