Re: [emacs-wiki-discuss] Planner and Muse

[John Wiegley]

TC <address@hidden> writes:

> Maybe I'm reading to much into the word "next", and at the risk of
> trying to mess with the shoelaces of the original author of
> emacs-wiki, is the above really true?
>
> By the looks of things, people like Sacha, Damien, Mark, etc [1]
> have the bit seriously between their teeth in maintaining and
> further developing emacs-wiki.
>
> muse may be a *new* development (a cool-looking one at that), but is
> it really the *next* stage, as opposed to an alternative or
> additional offering?

Muse does all that emacs-wiki will do -- except for some of the
"wiki"-ness -- and it does it much better, cleaner, and more
extensibly.  That's why I still say "next".  Also, Muse has been
accepted by RMS for inclusion within the Emacs distribution, as a
general authoring/publishing tool for Emacs users.  All that's left is
for me to finish the README.  Any volunteers out there? :)

John