[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tree-sitter api
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
Re: Tree-sitter api |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:01:22 -0700 |
> On Mar 29, 2022, at 7:13 PM, Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> As Po said, there is a package already using the ts prefix and that
>> package is popular enough. Maybe tsr? Anyway, I’d love a shorter
>> prefix other than tree-sitter, it is a real pain to type this long
>> prefix.
>
> Aren't shorthands supposed to fix that problem?
I was saying we can’t use ts as a prefix, but I agree with the idea of using a
shorter prefix.
Yuan
- Re: Tree-sitter api, (continued)
Re: Tree-sitter api, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/29
- Re: Tree-sitter api, Po Lu, 2022/03/29
- Re: Tree-sitter api, Yuan Fu, 2022/03/29
- Re: Tree-sitter api, Yuan Fu, 2022/03/29
- Re: Tree-sitter api, Po Lu, 2022/03/29
- Re: Tree-sitter api,
Yuan Fu <=
- Re: Tree-sitter api, Vitaly Ankh, 2022/03/29
- Re: Tree-sitter api, Yuan Fu, 2022/03/29
Re: Tree-sitter api, Po Lu, 2022/03/29
Re: Tree-sitter api, Yuan Fu, 2022/03/30
Re: Tree-sitter api, Phil Sainty, 2022/03/30
Re: Tree-sitter api, Phil Sainty, 2022/03/30
Re: Tree-sitter api, João Távora, 2022/03/30
Re: Tree-sitter api, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/03/29
Re: Tree-sitter api, Yuan Fu, 2022/03/29
Re: Tree-sitter api, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/03/30