|
From: | phillip . lord |
Subject: | Re: Emacs 27.1 Windows Binaries -- testing wanted |
Date: | Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:53:54 +0100 |
User-agent: | Roundcube Webmail/1.4.6 |
On 2020-08-22 11:40, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:21:27 +0100 From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > The correct answers can be found by comparing against > system-configuration-features, I think. > > And you have the same problem with your ERT-based approach, no? No, because the correct answers are hardcoded into the file.I'm confused: how can you know the correct answers in advance in one case, but not in the other?
I think we are talking cross purposes. I do not want to display all the output, I want to know what it should be. And I don't care about the output from things that work as expected only things that do not. All of this is what ert is designed for. I might like to tweak the output a little, but as ert doesn't have a pluggable interface, that's harder.
Of course, I could write this functionality again. But it looks like a test to me. Why not use ert?
Phil
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |