Re: next-error use cases

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 4/9/18 5:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 23:36:37 +0300
> > Cc: address@hidden
> >
> > > Define some kind of priority between them?
> > I really doubt we can define priorities such that the user will always
> > want to see the errors of some "kind" before the others.
>
> Then maybe this problem has no workable solution at all, and we
> shouldn't try running all those features from the same command.

We already do, though. So far we've come up with a manual switching 
solution (see next-error-select-buffer in master), and it's fine to a 
degree.

Having Flymake and Flyspell use the same mechanism shows its 
inefficiencies, however, so that's what I think this discussion is 
mostly about.