[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error use cases
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: next-error use cases |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Apr 2018 05:24:50 +0300 |
> From: Clément Pit-Claudel <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:26:59 -0400
>
> > We could try to define priorities by ‘add-function’.
>
> Or we could query all backends and go to the closest location. It would
> match with what the user sees on the screen: if I have a flyspell underline
> followed by a FlyCheck error, it would visit one then the other.
I don't think "closest location" is a reliable indicator in this
case. next-error exists to go to the next/previous locus, which could
be far away.
Re: next-error use cases, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/04/08
- Re: next-error use cases, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/09
- Re: next-error use cases, Charles A. Roelli, 2018/04/09
- Re: next-error use cases, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/09
- Re: next-error use cases, Stephen Leake, 2018/04/10
- Re: next-error use cases, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/10
- Re: next-error use cases, Stephen Leake, 2018/04/10
- Re: next-error use cases, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/04/11
- Re: next-error use cases, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/11
- Re: next-error use cases, Stephen Leake, 2018/04/12