[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error use cases
|
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
|
Subject: |
Re: next-error use cases |
|
Date: |
Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:26:59 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
On 2018-04-08 15:56, Juri Linkov wrote:
>>> So the question is how one buffer can provide many next-error functions
>>> by such different major/minor modes (flymake, flyspell) enabled in it
>>> at the same time?
>>
>> Define some kind of priority between them? And if two or more
>> functions have the same priority, ask the user?
>
> We could try to define priorities by ‘add-function’.
Or we could query all backends and go to the closest location. It would match
with what the user sees on the screen: if I have a flyspell underline followed
by a FlyCheck error, it would visit one then the other.
Re: next-error use cases, Dmitry Gutov, 2018/04/08
- Re: next-error use cases, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/04/09
- Re: next-error use cases, Charles A. Roelli, 2018/04/09
- Re: next-error use cases, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/09
- Re: next-error use cases, Stephen Leake, 2018/04/10
- Re: next-error use cases, Juri Linkov, 2018/04/10