[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: beginning-of-defun (again)
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: beginning-of-defun (again) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:13:56 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Is there a specific practical reason why it is important for the defuns in
> > init.el not to start in column 0?
> They are within macros controlling whether they are evaluated or compiled or
> not, based on available packages on the system.
I don't follow how that affects what column the openparen can be in.
Could you show what this looks like?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: beginning-of-defun (again), (continued)
Re: beginning-of-defun (again), John Wiegley, 2015/10/29
Re: beginning-of-defun (again),
Richard Stallman <=
Re: beginning-of-defun (again), Alan Mackenzie, 2015/10/30
Re: beginning-of-defun (again), John Wiegley, 2015/10/30
Re: beginning-of-defun (again), Richard Stallman, 2015/10/31
Re: beginning-of-defun (again), Alan Mackenzie, 2015/10/29
Re: beginning-of-defun (again), Alan Mackenzie, 2015/10/29
Re: beginning-of-defun (again), Richard Stallman, 2015/10/29