[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: beginning-of-defun (again)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: beginning-of-defun (again) |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:35:08 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > There's no reason for a defun to not start on a newline.
> This is not true. In my init.el where I use use-package, here are the
counts:
> defuns starting at column 0: 24
> defuns not starting at column 0: 120
A miscommunication is visible here. You're talking about whether they
_do_ start in column 0, and Oleh was talking about whether they _must_
not start in column 0.
Is there a specific practical reason why it is important for the
defuns in init.el not to start in column 0?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- beginning-of-defun (again), Andreas Röhler, 2015/10/29
- Re: beginning-of-defun (again), John Wiegley, 2015/10/29
- Re: beginning-of-defun (again), Richard Stallman, 2015/10/30
- Re: beginning-of-defun (again), Alan Mackenzie, 2015/10/30
- Re: beginning-of-defun (again), John Wiegley, 2015/10/30
- Re: beginning-of-defun (again), Richard Stallman, 2015/10/31
Re: beginning-of-defun (again), Alan Mackenzie, 2015/10/29