[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IDE
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:37:47 -0700 (PDT) |
> > Where "definition" can be whatever you want, AFAIK.
>
> "Definition" in this context means the implementation. There's only
> one implementation, but there might be many references
> (a.k.a. "calls").
That just assumes that you index only the "implementation".
In principle, a TAGS file could be created (including on the
fly) from not only "the implementation" files but also the
"calls" files.
> > A TAGS file is just an index. You can index whatever you like,
> > AFAIK.
>
> An index where the key is the symbol itself can only hold one instance
> of every symbol.
Is a TAGS file limited to symbols? I didn't think so.
And I definitely have TAGS files that have multiple entries
for the same symbol definition. The definitions are from
different source files, but they are in the same TAGS file
(in different sections, separated by form-feed chars).
For example:
^L
frame-cmds-OLD.el,1980
(defun iconify-everything ()iconify-everything298,11152
...
^L
frame-cmds.el,1890
(defun iconify-everything ()iconify-everything141,5218
- Re: IDE, (continued)
- Re: IDE, Nix, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/25
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/26