[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IDE
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 11:09:56 -0700 (PDT) |
> > And I definitely have TAGS files that have multiple entries
> > for the same symbol definition. The definitions are from
> > different source files, but they are in the same TAGS file
> > (in different sections, separated by form-feed chars).
> >
> > For example:
> > ^L
> > frame-cmds-OLD.el,1980
> > (defun iconify-everything ()iconify-everything298,11152
> > ...
> > ^L
> > frame-cmds.el,1890
> > (defun iconify-everything ()iconify-everything141,5218
>
> These are two different symbols, because the file name is (implicitly)
> part of it. There can be at most one definition per file, but many
> references.
Now you've changed the kind of "file" being talked about.
You are now presumably saying that there can be only one
definition for a given term per _source_ file, not per _TAGS_
file.
The question being discussed was whether you could have multiple
"definitions" of a term in the same TAGS file. And AFAICT you
can.
And a fortiori, you can have multiple definitions of a given
term in a set of multiple TAGS files, which is part of the
design for querying tags.
- RE: IDE, (continued)
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/25
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: IDE, Steinar Bang, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Andreas Schwab, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Óscar Fuentes, 2015/10/26
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/26