[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:56:02 +0300 |
> From: Nix <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
> Emacs: a Lisp interpreter masquerading as ... a Lisp interpreter!
> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:29:31 +0100
>
> On 24 Oct 2015, Eli Zaretskii outgrape:
>
> >> From: Nix <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>,
> >> Przemysław Wojnowski
> >> <address@hidden>,
> >> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> >> address@hidden
> >> Emacs: The Awakening
> >> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:17:10 +0100
> >>
> >> Raw TAGS files are more or less unsuitable for anything but C and Lisp,
> >> and are pretty poor even for that (e.g. you can only jump from uses to
> >> definitions, the definition can only be in one place...)
> >
> > Raw TAGS files are not supposed to be used for anything but
> > definitions.
> >
> > For references, you are supposed to use ID-Utils or something similar,
> > which use a different format of their DB.
>
> Two different tools, for more or less identical jobs except that one is
> one->many and the other is many->one? (In particular, the hard part
> isn't the data structure, but the parsing.)
>
> That strikes me as really, really ugly.
Are we still talking about an Emacs IDE? If so, there's only one
tool: Emacs. What happens behind the scenes is of interest to us
developers, but the user doesn't need to know, or even suspect.
Right?
- Re: Is EDE only intended to be used with languages which /require/ a 'compile' step? [was: Re: IDE], (continued)
- Re: IDE, Przemysław Wojnowski, 2015/10/15
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/15
- Re: IDE, Tom, 2015/10/12
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/12
- Re: IDE, Nix, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Nix, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Richard Stallman, 2015/10/25
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24
- RE: IDE, Drew Adams, 2015/10/24
- Re: IDE, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/10/24